Rating Rationale
February 20, 2019 | Mumbai
Andhra Pradesh Power Finance Corporation Limited
'Provisional CRISIL A+(SO)/Stable' assigned to bond
 
Rating Action
Rs.5000 Crore Bond Provisional CRISIL A+(SO)/Stable (Assigned)^
Rs.244.1 Crore Bond Series I/2004* CRISIL D (Withdrawn)
Rs.597.2 Crore Bond Series I/2005* CRISIL D (Reaffirmed)
Rs.1053.3 Crore Bond Series I/2010* CRISIL D (Reaffirmed)
Rs.898.3 Crore Bond Series I & II/2011* CRISIL D (Reaffirmed)
Rs.314.1 Crore Bond Series I/2012* CRISIL D (Reaffirmed)
1 crore = 10 million
Refer to annexure for Details of Instruments & Bank Facilities
*Amount outstanding as on March 31, 2013
^A prefix of 'Provisional' indicates that the rating centrally factors in strength of specific structures, and will be supported by certain critical documentation by the issuer, without which the rating would either have been different or not assigned ab initio. This is in compliance with a directive issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on May 6, 2015.
Detailed Rationale

CRISIL has assigned its 'Provisional CRISIL A+(SO)/Stable' rating to the proposed Rs 5000 crore bond issuance of Andhra Pradesh Power Finance Corporation Limited (APPFC). The provisional rating will be converted after receipt of executed documents, in line with the structure submitted to CRISIL.
 
CRISIL has reaffirmed its rating on the existing bonds (Bond Series I/2005, Bond Series I/2010, Bond Series I & II/2011, Bond Series I/2012, Bond Series II/2012) at CRISIL D as it continues to reflect instances of delay in meeting debt obligation. CRISIL has withdrawn its rating on Rs 244.10 Crore Bond Series I/2004 as it is fully redeemed. This is in line with CRISIL's withdrawal policy.
 
The rating on the proposed issuance of Rs 5000 crore reflects the strength of an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee provided by the bifurcated Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP), a trustee-administered escrow and payment mechanism for the bonds and adequate liquidity in the form of a debt service reserve account (DSRA) of two quarters of debt servicing. The rating also factors in the criticality of APPFC to the GoAP in financing the power sector in the state and budgetary allocation by the state towards servicing of the proposed bonds.
 
The ratings are supported by the good economic management of the state, with high industry friendliness, relatively healthy power sector and well-targeted productive outlays. These are partly offset by the moderate economic structure of the State with a small secondary sector and moderate State finances marked by high deficit and indebtedness levels (albeit impacted by the bifurcation of erstwhile unified AP) and periodic use of WMA limits.
  
The rating of the existing bonds of erstwhile APPFC reflects continued delays in debt servicing. Based on information received from the trustee, CRISIL understands that debt servicing for AP's share of liabilities has been timely in the past one year.
 
While APPFC has been making timely payment to investors for AP's share of liabilities, CRISIL highlights that the T structure (T-10) of crediting the bond servicing account prior to the due date has not been followed. However, CRISIL takes comfort in articulation by the GoAP that adequate measures would be taken to ensure timely payments towards servicing of APPFC bonds (both proposed and outstanding) as per schedule.
 
CRISIL had, on September 25, 2015, downgraded the rating on the bonds, which were guaranteed by the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP), to 'CRISIL D' from 'CRISIL A(SO)', while removing the rating from 'Rating Watch with Developing implications'. The downgrade reflects delays in debt servicing by APPFC on account of disputes with Telangana State Power Finance Corporation relating to distribution of assets and liabilities. Due to this, interest payment on some of the rated bonds was not made in full on the due date. CRISIL understands that there is no dues outstanding for payment as on January 31, 2019.

Analytical Approach

The ratings for the proposed Rs 5,000cr bonds are based on the unconditional and irrevocable guarantee from the bifurcated GoAP, guaranteeing full repayment of the principal and payment of interest in a timely manner. The ratings also factored in the strength of a trustee-administered payment structure.
 
While the existing bonds are guaranteed by the erstwhile GoAP, the rating reflects continued delays in debt servicing and non-invocation of the guarantee by the trustee.

Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
* Presence of a comprehensive guarantee from GoAP along with a strong payment structure
The proposed issuance benefits from budgetary allocation by the GoAP in meeting interest and principal obligations. Additionally, it derives support from an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee from the bifurcated GoAP. The guarantee is also continuing and the liability of the guarantor shall not be revoked by an insolvency, liquidation etc. Furthermore, the structure benefits from credit enhancement provided by a well-defined T-structured guarantee trigger mechanism, an adequate liquidity buffer, and an independent trustee monitoring mechanism.
 
The rating is supported by presence of a 2-quarter upfront DSRA as a liquidity cushion, which lowers the risk of any delay in receipt of payment from the State Government. CRISIL believes that the presence of the adequate liquidity buffers and the trustee oversight mechanism strengthens the payment structure and provides adequate protection from any administrative delay.
 
* Strong support from GoAP due to critical role of power sector
The vidyut bonds issued by APPFC will be used to finance the operational requirements of the Andhra Pradesh power discoms. Power sector enjoys strong support from GoAP owing to its criticality in supporting the ecosystem of the state. Moreover, government supports the agriculture sector and promotes industrialisation by providing subsidized power.
 
APPFC has been formed to provide financial assistance to the power sector in the state. Hence CRISIL believes that strong support from the government would be extended to APPFC, when required.
 
* Good economic management by Government of Andhra Pradesh
The rating factors in the good economic management by GoAP. It has undertaken a number of reforms to increase its industry friendliness (it ranks amongst the highest in Ease of Doing Business). It also has relatively healthy power sector compared to other states necessitating lesser amount of funding support from the GoAP. Further, CRISIL believes that the government is targeting its expenditure well towards developmental objectives like education and irrigation, which are expected to have a positive effect on improving the social and economic indices of the state.
 
Weakness
* State has a moderate economic structure
Andhra Pradesh has a moderate economic structure marked by a lower-than-average share of secondary sector and higher share of primary sector in Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP). This tilt in economic structure has an adverse impact on the tax/GSDP ratio, as secondary and tertiary sector have a higher tax potential. Its socio-economic and human development indicators are moderate (e.g. literacy rate of 67% versus national average of 74%), necessitating higher social outlays. However, CRISIL believes that the economic structure should improve given the state's industry friendliness and investment in infrastructure. AP also has a fairly high per capita income, and has enjoyed fast GSDP growth driven by growth in the tertiary and primary sectors.
 
* Moderate state finances marked by high deficits and indebtedness, impacted by bifurcation
Although erstwhile unified GoAP benefited from revenue surpluses and moderate levels of deficits and indebtedness, residual GoAP's state finances have got impacted due to the state bifurcation in fiscal 2015 with debt apportioned in the population ratio of 58:42 between residual Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Deficits are on an improving trend revenue deficit to GSDP is down from 2.4% in FY2017 to 2.0% in FY2018 and 0.3% in FY2019 (Revised Estimates) while fiscal deficit to GSDP is down from 4.4% (FY2017) to 4.0% (FY2018) and 3.2% (FY2019RE). However, the indebtedness remains high with total debt plus guarantee to GSDP at 32.9% in FY2018. CRISIL expects deficits to improve, although continued grants-in-aid by the Central Government would be crucial (22% of total FY2018 revenues). Aggregate debt as share of GSDP should trend down only slowly, given the state's large development needs. The state has moderate liquidity and accesses Ways and Means Advances to manage liquidity and lower interest costs.

* Failure of designated payment structure: The rating on the existing bonds factors in the failure of the payment structure and the inability of the trustee to ensure adherence to the trustee-administered structure (non-invocation of guarantee).
Liquidity

CRISIL believes that APPFC enjoys adequate liquidity primarily driven by the GoAP support as cashflows for debt servicing forms a part of the budgetary allocation. Additionally, APPFC will maintain a DSRA of 2 quarters on a rolling basis for the proposed bonds.

Outlook: Stable

CRISIL believes APPFC's proposed bonds will benefit from its strong payment structure and support from GoAP.
 
Upside scenario:
* Sustained improvement in state's deficit levels and its indebtedness
 
Downside scenario:
* Deterioration in GoAP's fiscal performance over the medium term.
* Narrowing of liquidity buffers or non-adherence to payment structure

About the Company

APPFC was set up to provide financial assistance to the power sector in Andhra Pradesh. In fiscal 2017 as well as fiscal 2016, there was no profit after tax while total income was Rs 215 Crore and Rs 217 crore, respectively.

Key Financial Indicators (reported numbers):
Particulars Unit 2019 (RE) 2018 (Accounts)
Revenue Receipts Rs. Cr. 1,56,364 1,05,062
Revenue Deficit Rs. Cr. 2,494 16,152
Gross Fiscal Deficit Rs. Cr 29,141 32,372
GFD/GSDP % 3.2 4.0
Debt*/GSDP % 34.4 34.2
RR/Interest Times 9.91 7.59
*CRISIL Adjusted Debt

Any other information: Not applicable

Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument:
CRISIL complexity levels are assigned to various types of financial instruments. The CRISIL complexity levels are available on www.crisil.com/complexity-levels. Users are advised to refer to the CRISIL complexity levels for instruments that they consider for investment. Users may also call the Customer Service Helpdesk with queries on specific instruments.
Annexure - Details of Instrument(s)
ISIN Name of Instrument Date of Allotment Coupon
Rate (%)
Maturity Date Issue Size (Rs. Crore) Rating Assigned with Outlook
INE847E08CY9
INE847E08CZ6
Bond Series I/2005*  30-Mar-2005
04-Apr-2005
8.15% 29-Mar-2020
03-Apr-2020
597.20 CRISIL D
INE847E09011
INE847E09029
Bond Series I/2010*  15-Nov-2010 8.49%
8.74%
15-Nov-2020
15-Nov-2022
1053.30 CRISIL D
INE847E08DK6
INE847E08DJ8
INE847E08DL4
INE847E08DM2
Bond Series I & II/2011*  15-Dec-2011
30-Jan-2012
9.60%
9.10% 9.85% 9.97%
15-Dec-2023
15-Dec-2021
30-Jan-2022
30-Jan-2024
898.30 CRISIL D
INE847E08DN0
INE847E08DO8
Bond Series I/2012*  08-Jun-2012 9.50% 9.64% 08-Jun-2022
08-Jun-2024
314.10 CRISIL D
INE847E08DP5 Bond Series II/2012*  18-Jul-2012 9.75% 18-Jul-2022 1000.00 CRISIL D
NA Bond** NA NA NA 5000.00 Provisional CRISIL A+(SO)/Stable
*Amount outstanding as on March 31, 2013
**Yet to be placed
 
Annexure - Details of Rating Withdrawn
ISIN Name of
Instrument
Date of
Allotment
Coupon
Rate (%)
Maturity
Date
Issue Size
(Rs. Crore)
INE847E08DD1
INE847E08DF6
 Bond Series I/2004*  12-Feb-2005
22-Feb-2005
7.70% 11-Feb-2015
21-Feb-2015
244.10
*Amount outstanding as on March 31, 2013
Annexure - Rating History for last 3 Years
  Current 2019 (History) 2018  2017  2016  Start of 2016
Instrument Type Outstanding Amount Rating Date Rating Date Rating Date Rating Date Rating Rating
Bond  LT  8862.90
31-03-13 
CRISIL D| Provisional CRISIL A+(SO)/Stable      30-11-18  CRISIL D  27-11-17  CRISIL D  21-11-16  CRISIL D  CRISIL D 
All amounts are in Rs.Cr.
Links to related criteria
CRISILs Approach to Financial Ratios
Rating Criteria for State Governments

For further information contact:
Media Relations
Analytical Contacts
Customer Service Helpdesk
Saman Khan
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
D: +91 22 3342 3895
B: +91 22 3342 3000
saman.khan@crisil.com

Naireen Ahmed
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
D: +91 22 3342 1818
B: +91 22 3342 3000
naireen.ahmed@crisil.com

Vinay Rajani
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
D: +91 22 3342 1835
M: +91 91 676 42913
B: +91 22 3342 3000
vinay.rajani@ext-crisil.com

Sachin Gupta
Senior Director - CRISIL Ratings
CRISIL Limited
D:+91 22 3342 3023
Sachin.Gupta@crisil.com


Manish Kumar Gupta
Director - CRISIL Ratings
CRISIL Limited
B:+91 124 672 2000
manish.gupta@crisil.com


Priyanka Daga
Rating Analyst - CRISIL Ratings
CRISIL Limited
D:+91 22 3342 8462
priyanka.daga@crisil.com
Timings: 10.00 am to 7.00 pm
Toll free Number:1800 267 1301

For a copy of Rationales / Rating Reports:
CRISILratingdesk@crisil.com
 
For Analytical queries:
ratingsinvestordesk@crisil.com


 

Note for Media:
This rating rationale is transmitted to you for the sole purpose of dissemination through your newspaper / magazine / agency. The rating rationale may be used by you in full or in part without changing the meaning or context thereof but with due credit to CRISIL. However, CRISIL alone has the sole right of distribution (whether directly or indirectly) of its rationales for consideration or otherwise through any media including websites, portals etc.


About CRISIL Limited

CRISIL is a leading agile and innovative, global analytics company driven by its mission of making markets function better. We are India’s foremost provider of ratings, data, research, analytics and solutions. A strong track record of growth, culture of innovation and global footprint sets us apart. We have delivered independent opinions, actionable insights, and efficient solutions to over 1,00,000 customers.
 
We are majority owned by S&P Global Inc., a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide.
 
For more information, visit www.crisil.com 


Connect with us: TWITTER | LINKEDIN | YOUTUBE | FACEBOOK

About CRISIL Ratings
CRISIL Ratings is part of CRISIL Limited (“CRISIL”). We pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. CRISIL is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, CRISIL sets the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 24,500 large and mid-scale corporates and financial institutions. CRISIL has also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially guaranteed instruments and microfinance institutions. We also pioneered a globally unique rating service for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and significantly extended the accessibility to rating services to a wider market. Over 1,10,000 MSMEs have been rated by us.


CRISIL PRIVACY
 
CRISIL respects your privacy. We may use your contact information, such as your name, address, and email id to fulfil your request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL.For further information on CRISIL’s privacy policy please visit www.crisil.com.


DISCLAIMER

This disclaimer forms part of and applies to each credit rating report and/or credit rating rationale that we provide (each a “Report”). For the avoidance of doubt, the term “Report” includes the information, ratings and other content forming part of the Report. The Report is intended for the jurisdiction of India only. This Report does not constitute an offer of services. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing in the Report is to be construed as CRISIL providing or intending to provide any services in jurisdictions where CRISIL does not have the necessary licenses and/or registration to carry out its business activities referred to above. Access or use of this Report does not create a client relationship between CRISIL and the user.

We are not aware that any user intends to rely on the Report or of the manner in which a user intends to use the Report. In preparing our Report we have not taken into consideration the objectives or particular needs of any particular user. It is made abundantly clear that the Report is not intended to and does not constitute an investment advice. The Report is not an offer to sell or an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment in any securities, instruments, facilities or solicitation of any kind or otherwise enter into any deal or transaction with the entity to which the Report pertains. The Report should not be the sole or primary basis for any investment decision within the meaning of any law or regulation (including the laws and regulations applicable in the US).

Ratings from CRISIL Rating are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities / instruments or to make any investment decisions. Any opinions expressed here are in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only current as of the stated date of their issue. CRISIL assumes no obligation to update its opinions following publication in any form or format although CRISIL may disseminate its opinions and analysis. CRISIL rating contained in the Report is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment or other business decisions. The recipients of the Report should rely on their own judgment and take their own professional advice before acting on the Report in any way.CRISIL or its associates may have other commercial transactions with the company/entity.

Neither CRISIL nor its affiliates, third party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively, “CRISIL Parties”) guarantee the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the Report, and no CRISIL Party shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of any part of the Report. EACH CRISIL PARTY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall any CRISIL Party be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of any part of the Report even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

CRISIL Ratings may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of the instruments, facilities, securities or from obligors. CRISIL’s public ratings and analysis as are required to be disclosed under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (and other applicable regulations, if any) are made available on its web sites, www.crisil.com (free of charge). Reports with more detail and additional information may be available for subscription at a fee – more details about CRISIL ratings are available here: www.crisilratings.com.

CRISIL and its affiliates do not act as a fiduciary. While CRISIL has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, CRISIL does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives and / or relies in its Reports. CRISIL keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of the respective activity. As a result, certain business units of CRISIL may have information that is not available to other CRISIL business units. CRISIL has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. CRISIL has in place a ratings code of conduct and policies for analytical firewalls and for managing conflict of interest. For details please refer to: https://www.crisil.com/en/home/our-businesses/ratings/regulatory-disclosures/highlighted-policies.html

CRISIL’s rating criteria are generally available without charge to the public on the CRISIL public web site, www.crisil.com. For latest rating information on any instrument of any company rated by CRISIL you may contact CRISIL RATING DESK at CRISILratingdesk@crisil.com, or at (0091) 1800 267 1301.

This Report should not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person or in any form without a prior written consent of CRISIL.

All rights reserved @ CRISIL