Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Surajbari project – Improved operational performance supporting healthy debt protection metrics and strong liquidity
PLFs grew to 21% in fiscal 2022 from 17.9% in fiscal 2021, with generation registering a growth of ~20% y-o-y in the first quarter of fiscal 2023. Despite weak generation in fiscal 2021, (below the P-90 level of 23.4%), company had used excess liquidity to prepay around Rs 5.5 crore of long-term loan in fiscal 2021. This has resulted in lowering of the overall tenure of existing term debt by a couple of quarters along with interest cost reduction. Consequently, the average DSCR for the project is expected to remain healthy over the remaining tenure of the loan, with PLFs expected to stabilise at P-90 levels. Further, as on June 30, 2022, the project had free cash and debt service reserve account (DSRA) balance of ~Rs 17.6 crore against debt obligations of ~Rs 13.4 crore due in fiscal 2023, indicating strong liquidity cover of more than 15 months.
- Surajbari project – Strong and diversified counterparties with comfortable payment cycle
Out of total project capacity of 34.5 MW, Phase 1 (16.5 MW) of the project has a 20-year power-purchase agreement (PPA) with Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd (GUVNL), and Phase 2 capacity (18 MW) is tied-up with strong industrial counterparties. The average payment track record has consistently remained below 1 month in the past three years. The payment cycle is expected to remain stable going forward as well. Any weakening in the cycle will be a rating sensitivity factor.
- Healthy business risk profile along with improvement in counterparty mix
The business risk profile of CGEIPL is driven by equity and debentures held in its six operational SPVs, which are part of the CRG, (644.1 MW of wind and 78.8 MWp of solar capacities across Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu), Kutch Windfarm Development Pvt Ltd (KWDPL, 28 MW wind asset in Gujarat) and three partly commissioned Gujarat-based SPVs (which include Morjar Windfarm Development Pvt Ltd [148.5 MW wind asset, with 67.5 MW commissioned], Continuum Trinethra Renewables Pvt Ltd [99.9 MW wind and 140.0 MWp solar, with 37.8 MW of wind and 17.5 MWp of solar commissioned] and Continuum Power Trading (TN) Pvt Ltd [126 MW wind asset, with 88 MW commissioned).
The CRG structure provides diversification benefits and strong financial flexibility to absorb any delays from distribution companies (discoms) or weak operating performance. This significantly lowers the dependence of these companies on CGEIPL for funding support.
For projects other than CRG (436.9 MW of wind and 140 MWp of solar, including those nearing completion), the counterparty profile includes Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) and commercial and industrial (C&I) customers. This is expected to enhance the counterparty mix with share of weaker state utilities falling to 28.4% (from the current 37.1%), post commissioning of under-construction assets (expected by the third quarter of fiscal 2023). Further, implementation risk for under-construction assets is low as a part of these capacities are already operational with entire land and evacuation infrastructure in place, and equity and debt sanctions tied-up.
CGEIPL receives cash flow from these existing assets in the form of management fee, interest income on compulsorily/optionally convertible debentures, or inter-corporate deposits. The holding company has received surplus funds, post meeting restricted payment conditions as defined under financing agreements, from the SPVs under CRG and the Surajbari project over the past two fiscals.
- Improved financial flexibility post refinancing of existing non-convertible debentures (NCDs) and fund raise towards equity requirements for future projects
The company has fully refinanced existing NCDs of Rs 800 crore which were due in April 2026, using funds from an associate entity Continuum Energy Aura Pte Ltd (CEAPL), a Singapore-based 100% subsidiary of Continuum Green Energy Ltd (CGEL, also the parent entity of CGEIPL). CEAPL had raised USD 400 million through issuance of bonds, in July and August 2022.
These bonds are to be repaid through a single bullet at the end of their tenure in January 2026, with half-yearly interest servicing. Further, the management has indicated that they would maintain sufficient liquidity to cover interest payments over the near term, while the newer assets ramp-up generation.
In the long run, the proceeds of the CEAPL bond are expected to be utilised for equity infusion into the next leg of projects totaling ~1.2 GW (with first phase of ~822 MW, to be implemented over the next 12 to 15 months). However, as per management, funds will be drawn at CGEIPL level based on project progress. This along with other hedging mechanisms to be adopted is expected to mitigate the foreign exchange risk.
CRISIL Ratings believes surplus from existing projects (CRG and Surajbari) and under-construction assets as they ramp-up should be sufficient to cover the interest obligations for the CEAPL bond. As on June 30, 2022, CGEIPL had unencumbered cash of Rs 182 crore.
Weaknesses:
- Counterparty credit risk emanating from exposure to weak discoms
Around 37% of the operational portfolio (which shall reduce to 28.4% once the under-construction capacity is operational) is exposed to high counterparty credit risk, with significant delays seen in payments from the state discoms viz. MSEDCL and MPPMCL, post the COVID-19 pandemic. As on June 30, 2022, the total outstanding dues from MSEDCL (for BWDPL) stood at Rs 214 crore, which translates to receivables of 365 days (on trailing 12-month revenue) and that from MPPMCL (for DJEPL and UUPPL) stood at Rs 253 crore with receivables of ~450 days.
Going forward, however, MPPMCL has opted to liquidate outstanding dues along with late payment surcharge pertaining to generation upto March 2022, by paying equal monthly installments of ~Rs 4.6 per month over a 40-month period. As per the management, they have received the first installment in August 2022. Also, for generation beyond March 2022, MPPMCL is now expected to pay dues within timelines as per PPAs. It has received ~Rs 55 crore in August 2022 for generation in the months of April and May 2022. Further, MSEDCL has also paid ~Rs 88 crore in August 2022. While these have led to an improvement in receivables, any further stretch in the payment cycle from these two discoms is a key rating sensitivity factor.
- Exposure to risks inherent in operating wind-energy assets
Wind power generation is highly vulnerable to seasonality and variance in wind intensity. Given that cash flows are highly sensitive to PLFs of wind assets, these risks could severely impair debt-servicing and free cash flows of operational projects, in-turn impacting up-streaming of cash flow to CGEIPL.
The Surajbari project has an established track record of operations (over 8 years), having witnessed multiple full wind seasons. The project has consistently performed at a PLF of more than P-90 (23.4%) over fiscals 2016-2020. However, in fiscal 2021, PLF levels fell significantly to 17.9% due to the weak wind pattern and one-time issues. While generation improved in fiscal 2021, with PLF at 21.0%, it remained lower than P-90 levels. Further, for operational projects in the group, weighted average generation remains below P-90 level due to weak wind pattern and one-time issues.
CRISIL Ratings expects operating performance to remain close to the P-90 levels in future, given the operating track record of projects. However, any deviation in the operating performance can impact the cash flows and thus remains a key monitorable.
- Average financial risk profile of the holding company and refinance risk
The financial risk profile is constrained by moderate debt protection metrics. In fiscal 2023, net debt to trailing twelve months earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) ratio is expected to be around 8 times (while debt taken for under-construction assets is loaded, Ebitda contribution will start mainly from fiscal 2024; around 5.9 times in fiscal 2022). Adjusted interest cover is projected at 1.4 times in fiscal 2023 (1.1 times in fiscal 2022). Net debt to Ebitda levels are expected to correct going forward as the under-construction assets fully ramp-up. Further, CGEIPL is dependent on up-streaming of cash flows from its SPVs. While, it has sufficient liquidity in the near term, any delays in receiving cash flows from SPVs to support CGEIPL’s debt servicing requirements will be a key rating sensitivity factor.
The group will remain exposed to debt refinancing risk, with the CEAPL bond maturing in January 2026. However, healthy business risk of underlying assets and healthy blended DSCR over available useful life of the projects lends comfort.
- Exposure to implementation and stabilisation risks
In calendar year 2022, the group has so far commissioned 221.3 MW of wind and 17.5 MWp of solar capacities and is currently implementing 181.1 MW of wind and 122.5 MWp of solar capacities, (expected to be commissioned by third quarter of fiscal 2023). Further, it is developing another ~822 MW of wind and solar capacities which will be implemented over the next 12 to 15 months. Thus, the group remains exposed to stabilisation and implementation risks. However, the track record of execution and calibrated expansion strategy with a prudent funding mix lends comfort. Moreover, CRISIL Ratings understands that any expansion is expected to be backed by strong visibility for evacuation and PPA. Any significant deviation from these factors will be a monitorable.
- Exposure to regulatory changes in tariff structure and wind policy
The PPAs with third-party customers are tied-up on a gross tariff basis with charges relating to open access, cross subsidy surcharge and additional charges borne by the SPVs. Typically, the PPAs provide for sharing of increase or decrease in industrial tariffs and various regulatory charges with the customers. As a result, the ability of the company to pass on the quantum of these regulatory charges to customers, as per the terms of the PPA, remains monitorable from a credit perspective.