Rating Rationale
June 24, 2022 | Mumbai

Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board

'CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative' Converted from Provisional Rating to Final Rating for Rs.300 crore Long-term loan

 

Rating Action

Total Bank Loan Facilities Rated

Rs.10000 Crore

Long Term Rating

Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative (Reaffirmed)

Long Term Rating

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative (Reaffirmed)

Long Term Rating

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative (Converted from Provisional Rating to Final Rating)

1 crore = 10 million   

Refer to annexure for Details of Instruments & Bank Facilities

^A prefix of 'Provisional' indicates that the rating centrally factors in the strength of specific structures and is contingent upon occurrence of certain steps or execution of certain documents by the issuer, as applicable, without which the rating would either have been different or not assigned ab initio. This is in compliance with a May 6, 2015, directive ‘Standardizing the term, rating symbol, and manner of disclosure with regards to conditional/provisional/ in-principle ratings assigned by credit rating agencies' by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and an April 27, 2021, circular ‘Standardizing and Strengthening Policies on Provisional Rating by Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) for Debt Instruments’ respectively by SEBI.

Detailed Rationale

CRISIL Ratings has converted its provisional rating assigned to the Rs 300 crore proposed long-term bank loan of Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) to final rating of ‘CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative’. It has also reaffirmed its ‘CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative’ rating on the existing Rs 7,150 crore long-term bank facility and its ‘Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative’ rating on the proposed long-term bank facility of Rs 2,550 crore.

 

The rating is converted from provisional into final upon receipt of the final executed guarantee deed and term loan agreement for the Rs 300 crore of term loan facilities with a well-defined T+29 payment structure and a guarantee invocation mechanism. These executed documents are in line with the expectation based on which the provisional rating was assigned.

 

The remaining bank facilities of Rs 2,550 crore are expected to carry the same payment structure. The rating on these facilities remains provisional and will be converted into final upon receipt of the final documentation.

 

The rating continues to reflect the unconditional and irrevocable guarantee provided by the Government of Kerala, the escrow and payment mechanism, and adequate liquidity of two quarters in the form of a debt service reserve account (DSRA) and the KIIFB corpus. The rating also factors in the regular and timely allocation of motor vehicle tax (MVT) along with petroleum cess for debt servicing. The rating is supported by the strong socio-economic indicators of the state.

 

On September 15, 2020, the outlook on the rating was revised to ‘Negative’ due to expected strain on the financial risk profile of the Kerala government over the medium term on account of pandemic-induced disruptions and the resultant decline in economic activity. This was expected to increase revenue deficit (RD) and indebtedness[1] for the state. While recovery in tax collections in fiscal 2022 was supported by revival of economic activities and stable expenditure, any slowdown in recovery moving ahead may result in sustained elevated deficit and indebtedness, leading to a rating downgrade


[1] Ratio of total debt and guarantees to gross state domestic product (GSDP)

Analytical Approach

CRISIL Ratings has applied its criteria for rating instruments backed by guarantees. In addition to the state guarantee, the payment mechanism provides liquidity cushion through DSRA, the KIIFB corpus and escrow arrangement of MVT and petroleum cess under the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund (KIIF) Act. The liquidity buffer mitigates the risk of delayed payment, if any, from the state government, thus lowering the risk for the instrument.

Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description

Strengths:

  • Robust cash flow defined under the amended KIIF Act

The primary cash flow for meeting debt obligation is through MVT and petroleum cess allocation under the KIIF Act. The MVT and petroleum cess collected by the state government in the previous fiscal are transferred to KIIFB on a daily basis in proportion, as highlighted in the KIIF Act, such that the required allocation is transferred to KIIFB in the first nine months of the fiscal.

 

For MVT, there is a progressive step-up in terms of allocation to KIIFB from 10% in the first fiscal (2016) to 50% in the fifth (2020), with equal increments in the interim; the allocation will remain 50% thereafter. For any shortfall in the primary cash flow, the structure draws support from the statutory obligation of the government to cover the shortfall under the KIIF Act 2016. KIIFB received MVT and petroleum cess of Rs 2,390 crore in fiscal 2022, which also includes additional 10% funds on last fiscal’s transfer from the state government as partial compensation for lower collections on account of the pandemic. For fiscal 2023, KIIFB has already received Rs 746 crore as of June 22, 2022 and expects to receive Rs 2,629 crore for the full fiscal.

 

  • Strong internal control mechanism providing protection from administrative delay

The Government of Kerala has set up a robust internal control mechanism exercised by the Fund Trustee and Advisory Commission. The committee has professionals from the Reserve Bank of India and various other financial institutions, thereby instilling financial discipline for servicing debt. KIIFB maintains surplus liquidity of Rs 2,820 crore as a corpus and had cash and equivalent of Rs 2,790 crore as on June 22, 2022. Though cash may reduce as disbursements pick up, KIIFB keeps a minimum liquidity buffer of six months of project payments and debt obligation as a practice. Adequate liquidity buffer along with internal oversight mechanism should provide the required protection from any administrative delay in receiving funds from the state government for servicing debt.

 

  • Strategic importance to the Government of Kerala for infrastructure development

For long, Kerala has focused on developing human capital, having chosen to trade off physical capital in the bargain. The state government is now focused on hard capital development. KIIFB remains critical to it as an off-balance sheet vehicle, with an assured source of revenue (duly ring-fenced) and being in charge of implementing significant infrastructure plans. The government is looking to finance capital outlay even while squeezing revenue deficit through KIIFB mechanism. Hence, the government revived KIIFB in 2016 to act as an infrastructure financing arm. The board had approved projects worth Rs 70,762 crore and has made disbursements of around Rs 20,185 crore as on June 22, 2022. The organisation is headed by the political and bureaucratic leadership of the state.

 

  • Strong socio-economic parameters

Kerala has invested significantly in building its human capital through enhanced social sector spends, which is the highest among peers. The continued outlays have had healthy outcomes, and Kerala remains the top state in human development indices. The state has high literacy, life expectancy and per capita income. These afford flexibility to reduce related expenses to create additional fiscal space, if required.

 

Weaknesses:

  • Small secondary sector of the state, consistent revenue deficit and high dependence on remittances
    The share of the secondary sector in the GSDP of Kerala is low, partly weakened by modest industry friendliness; as reflected in the lower-than-average score on the ease of doing business index. The state has had consistent revenue deficit for the past few fiscals, primarily because of a modest share in central taxes, low own-tax and non-tax revenue and large committed expenditure base (61% of revenue expenditure on average) under salaries, pensions and interest.

 

Due to revival of economic activity, the own tax collections of the state grew by 19% in fiscal 2022 (CAG) compared with fiscal 2021, due to support from the Centre in the form of revenue deficit grants based on the 15th Finance Commission recommendation; improved SGST; higher devolutions from central government; and better sales tax collections. The revenue deficit grants for the state increased to Rs 19,891 crore in fiscal 2022 from Rs 15,321 crore in fiscal 2021, though it is expected to reduce in fiscal 2023 to ~ Rs 13,174 crore. The absolute share of Kerala in central taxes also rose because of improved tax collection by the Centre. Based on the 15th Finance Commission recommendation, between fiscals 2022 and 2026, the state’s share in the central tax pool will be 1.925%. However, during the period, revenue expenditure for the state also increased by 13% on-year. So, while the RD/GSDP is expected to narrow to 2% in 2022 from 2.8% in fiscal 2021, it remains elevated and a key monitorable, and any delay in further recovery of the same will be a key rating sensitivity factor.

 

The central government provided a loan of Rs 5,766 crore to Kerala in fiscal 2021 to compensate for the lower GST (goods and services tax) collections, which has helped the state to fund expenses. Also, the interest and principal obligations on this loan will be met by the Centre from future cess collections. The central government has also provided similar support to compensate for the lower GST collections in fiscal 2022 with total loan of Rs 1.59 lakh crore to all states.

 

  • High indebtedness with modest economic management

Total debt plus guarantee to GSDP ratio is expected at ~42% in fiscal 2022, marginally improved from 43.5% in fiscal 2021; though it remains elevated. The state also continues to rely on ways and means advances, special drawing facility and overdraft facility extended by the RBI, thereby indicating modest economic management.

Liquidity: Adequate

Liquidity is supported by daily escrow of MVT and petroleum cess, which will be prioritised for debt servicing. KIIFB maintains surplus liquidity of Rs 2,820 crore as corpus and had cash and equivalent of Rs 2,790 crore as on June 22, 2022. Net cash inflow from MVT and cess collections will be adequate to meet debt obligation in fiscal 2023

Outlook: Negative

KIIFB will continue to benefit from its strong payment structure and support from the Kerala government. However, the state finances remain constrained on account of high indebtedness and revenue deficit levels, which may even widen in fiscal 2023 due to elevated expenses and reduction in revenue deficit grants and GST compensation

Rating Sensitivity factors

Upward factors

  • Sustained reduction in state government revenue deficit to below 0.5% of GSDP
  • Steady decline in indebtedness (including guarantees) to under 30% of GSDP

 

Downward factors

  • Narrowing of credit buffer or non-adherence to the payment structure
  • Sustained increase in revenue deficit to above 2.3% of GSDP

Adequacy of credit enhancement structure

The guarantee provided by the Government of Kerala is unconditional and irrevocable and covers the entire rated amount for bank loans with the presence of DSRA of two quarters. For the proposed bank loan facility, KIIFB will likely adhere to a similar payment structure. It has a robust cash flow defined under the KIIF Act, which is adequate to cover the interest and principal payments and operational expenses.

Unsupported ratings: CRISIL BBB

CRISIL Ratings has introduced the 'CE' suffix for instruments having explicit credit enhancement feature in compliance with a SEBI circular dated June 13, 2019.

Key drivers for unsupported ratings

For arriving at the unsupported rating, CRISIL Ratings has considered the standalone business and financial risk profiles of KIIFB. Business risk profile factors in the strategic importance of KIIFB to the state to boost infrastructure development. The board has a robust cash flow defined under the KIIF Act, which is adequate to cover the interest and principal payments and operational expenses. Furthermore, it maintains adequate liquidity in the form of cash and bank balance and DSRA of two quarters. The rating is, however, constrained by the weak finances of Kerala, driven by consistently high deficit and indebtedness.

Additional disclosures for the provisional rating

CRISIL Ratings is yet to receive the following documents and understands from the issuer that the same are in the process being shared shortly.

                      Executed guarantee deed

                      Term loan agreement

 

The provisional rating shall be converted into a final rating after receipt of transaction documents duly executed within 90 days from the date of issuance of the instrument.

 

The final rating assigned after conversion shall be consistent with the available documents. In case of non-receipt of the duly executed transaction documents within the above-mentioned timelines, the rating committee of CRISIL Ratings may grant an extension of up to another 90 days in line with its policy on provisional ratings.

Rating that would have been assigned in the absence of the pending documentation

In the absence of pending documentation considered while assigning provisional rating as mentioned above, CRISIL Ratings would have assigned a rating of ‘CRISIL BBB’.

Risks associated with the provisional rating:

The 'Provisional' prefix indicates that the rating is contingent on occurrence of certain steps or execution of certain documents by the issuer, as applicable. If the documents received and/or completion of steps deviate significantly from the expectations, CRISIL Ratings may take an appropriate action, including placing the rating on watch or changing the rating/outlook, depending on the status of progress on a case to case basis. In the absence of the pending steps / documentation, the rating on the instrument would not have been assigned ab initio.

About the Organisation

KIIFB was formed on November 11, 1999, under the KIIF Act, 1999 (Act 4 of 2000), to manage the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund. The purpose of the fund was to provide investment for infrastructure projects in Kerala. The enabling Act and Scheme were amended in August 2016 to mobilise funds for infrastructure development in Kerala. KIIFB is headed by the political and bureaucratic leadership of the state.

Key Financial Indicators KIIFB financials (Standalone)

Particulars

Unit

2021

2020

Operating income

Rs crore

4,808

2,640

Profit after tax (PAT)

Rs crore

NM

NM

PAT margin

%

NM

NM

Adjusted debt/adjusted networth

Times

3.2

2.1

Interest coverage

Times

NA

NA

 

Key Financials: Reported financials of the Government of Kerala

Particulars

Unit

2022 (CAG Provisionals)

2021 (Accounts)

2020 (Accounts)

Revenue receipts

Rs crore

125,286

103,383

90,225

Revenue deficit

Rs crore

17,843

22,515

14,495

Gross fiscal deficit 

Rs crore

34,107

38,348

23,865

GFD/GSDP  

%

3.7

4.8

2.8

Debt^/GSDP

%

42.2

43.5

34.3

RR/interest  

Times

6.3

4.9

4.5

^Debt + guarantees

List of covenants

Salient features of bank loans backed by state government guarantee

                      Term loans have principal moratorium of two years, during which DSRA of two quarters of interest will be maintained for all lenders except one, where DSRA is created after the moratorium. Following the moratorium, there will be two quarter DSRA of interest and principal obligations for all the lenders.

                      There is step-up allocation of the MVT and complete allocation of the petroleum cess to KIIFB under the KIIF Act. The cash flow will be prioritised for debt servicing.

                      The DSRA will be replenished, if dipped into, by way of drawdown on MVT/petroleum cess receipts in the KIIFB designated receipt account.

 

Transaction structure:

Date

Particulars

T-6

KIIFB to maintain sufficient balance in the escrow account

T-5

Lender shall monitor sufficiency of balance in the escrow account. If balance is inadequate, the DSRA will be dipped into. If the DSRA is utilised for payments, the shortfall should be replenished on priority by the borrower from the escrow account, which receives the inflow from the Government of Kerala pertaining to the borrower’s share of MVT and petroleum cess as per the KIIF Act

T

Due date for the payment

T+1

Invocation of guarantee through demand for payment notice. The guarantor shall make good the payment corresponding to the amount due to the lender within 30 days from the due date of the payment (T+30)

T+29

If the guarantee is not invoked by the lender, the guarantor shall make good payment of the amount due to the lender within 30 days of the due date

T+30

Deemed date of default

 

Any other information: Not applicable

Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument:
CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels are assigned to various types of financial instruments. The CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels are available on www.crisil.com/complexity-levels. Users are advised to refer to the CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels for instruments that they consider for investment. Users may also call the Customer Service Helpdesk with queries on specific instruments.

Annexure - Details of Instrument(s)

ISIN

Type of instrument

Date of allotment

Coupon
rate (%)

Maturity date

Issue size
(Rs crore)

Complexity

level

Rating assigned
with outlook

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Jan-29

1,000

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Jan-31

500

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Feb-29

500

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Sep-31

200

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Feb-32

250

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

June-31

750

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

June-33

500

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Sep-31

1,250

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Sep-33

1,000

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Dec-33

700

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Mar-33

500

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Long Term Loan

NA

NA

Sep-27

300

NA

CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

NA

Proposed Long Term Bank Loan Facility

NA

NA

NA

2,550

NA

Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE)/Negative

 

Annexure - Rating History for last 3 Years
  Current 2022 (History) 2021  2020  2019  Start of 2019
Instrument Type Outstanding Amount Rating Date Rating Date Rating Date Rating Date Rating Rating
Fund Based Facilities LT 10000.0 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative 28-03-22 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative 07-12-21 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative 15-09-20 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative 30-09-19 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Watch Negative Provisional CRISIL A+ (SO) /Stable
      --   -- 03-09-21 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative 24-03-20 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Watch Negative 07-09-19 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Stable --
      --   -- 12-03-21 Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative,CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative   --   -- --
Non Convertible Debentures LT   --   --   --   --   -- Withdrawn
All amounts are in Rs.Cr.
Annexure - Details of Bank Lenders & Facilities
Facility Amount (Rs.Crore) Name of Lender Rating
Long Term Loan 300 ICICI Bank Limited CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 700 Bank of India CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 1000 State Bank of India CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 750 Bank of Baroda CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 250 Corporation Bank CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 500 Indian Bank CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 200 Syndicate Bank CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 500 Union Bank of India CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 1250 Bank of Baroda CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 500 Indian Bank CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 1000 Bank of Maharashtra CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Long Term Loan 500 Canara Bank CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative
Proposed Long Term Bank Loan Facility 2550 Not Applicable Provisional CRISIL A+ (CE) /Negative

This Annexure has been updated on 24-Jun-22 in line with the lender-wise facility details as on 03-Sep-21 received from the rated entity.

Criteria Details
Links to related criteria
Rating Criteria for State Governments
Criteria for rating instruments backed by guarantees
Criteria for Notching up Stand Alone Ratings of Entities Based on Government Support
Understanding CRISILs Ratings and Rating Scales

Media Relations
Analytical Contacts
Customer Service Helpdesk

Aveek Datta
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
M: +91 99204 93912
B: +91 22 3342 3000
AVEEK.DATTA@crisil.com

Prakruti Jani
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
M: +91 98678 68976
B: +91 22 3342 3000
PRAKRUTI.JANI@crisil.com

Rutuja Gaikwad 
Media Relations
CRISIL Limited
B: +91 22 3342 3000
Rutuja.Gaikwad@ext-crisil.com


Anuj Sethi
Senior Director
CRISIL Ratings Limited
B:+91 44 6656 3100
anuj.sethi@crisil.com


Aditya Jhaver
Director
CRISIL Ratings Limited
B:+91 22 3342 3000
Aditya.Jhaver@crisil.com


Mohini Chatterjee
Senior Rating Analyst
CRISIL Ratings Limited
B:+91 22 3342 3000
Mohini.Chatterjee@crisil.com
Timings: 10.00 am to 7.00 pm
Toll free Number:1800 267 1301

For a copy of Rationales / Rating Reports:
CRISILratingdesk@crisil.com
 
For Analytical queries:
ratingsinvestordesk@crisil.com


 

Note for Media:
This rating rationale is transmitted to you for the sole purpose of dissemination through your newspaper/magazine/agency. The rating rationale may be used by you in full or in part without changing the meaning or context thereof but with due credit to CRISIL Ratings. However, CRISIL Ratings alone has the sole right of distribution (whether directly or indirectly) of its rationales for consideration or otherwise through any media including websites and portals.


About CRISIL Ratings Limited (A subsidiary of CRISIL Limited)

CRISIL Ratings pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, we set the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible/convertible/partially convertible bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 33,000 large and mid-scale corporates and financial institutions. We have also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including ratings for municipal bonds, partially guaranteed instruments and infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs).
 
CRISIL Ratings Limited ('CRISIL Ratings') is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CRISIL Limited ('CRISIL'). CRISIL Ratings Limited is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI").
 
For more information, visit www.crisilratings.com 

 



About CRISIL Limited

CRISIL is a global analytical company providing ratings, research, and risk and policy advisory services. We are India's leading ratings agency. We are also the foremost provider of high-end research to the world's largest banks and leading corporations.

CRISIL is majority owned by S&P Global Inc, a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide.


For more information, visit www.crisil.com

Connect with us: TWITTER | LINKEDIN | YOUTUBE | FACEBOOK


CRISIL PRIVACY NOTICE
 
CRISIL respects your privacy. We may use your contact information, such as your name, address and email id to fulfil your request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL. For further information on CRISIL’s privacy policy please visit www.crisil.com.



DISCLAIMER

This disclaimer is part of and applies to each credit rating report and/or credit rating rationale (‘report’) that is provided by CRISIL Ratings Limited (‘CRISIL Ratings’). To avoid doubt, the term ‘report’ includes the information, ratings and other content forming part of the report. The report is intended for the jurisdiction of India only. This report does not constitute an offer of services. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing in the report is to be construed as CRISIL Ratings providing or intending to provide any services in jurisdictions where CRISIL Ratings does not have the necessary licenses and/or registration to carry out its business activities referred to above. Access or use of this report does not create a client relationship between CRISIL Ratings and the user.

We are not aware that any user intends to rely on the report or of the manner in which a user intends to use the report. In preparing our report we have not taken into consideration the objectives or particular needs of any particular user. It is made abundantly clear that the report is not intended to and does not constitute an investment advice. The report is not an offer to sell or an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment in any securities, instruments, facilities or solicitation of any kind to enter into any deal or transaction with the entity to which the report pertains. The report should not be the sole or primary basis for any investment decision within the meaning of any law or regulation (including the laws and regulations applicable in the US).

Ratings from CRISIL Ratings are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell any securities/instruments or to make any investment decisions. Any opinions expressed here are in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only current as of the stated date of their issue. CRISIL Ratings assumes no obligation to update its opinions following publication in any form or format although CRISIL Ratings may disseminate its opinions and analysis. The rating contained in the report is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment or other business decisions. The recipients of the report should rely on their own judgment and take their own professional advice before acting on the report in any way. CRISIL Ratings or its associates may have other commercial transactions with the entity to which the report pertains.

Neither CRISIL Ratings nor its affiliates, third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively, ‘CRISIL Ratings Parties’) guarantee the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the report, and no CRISIL Ratings Party shall have any liability for any errors, omissions or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of any part of the report. EACH CRISIL RATINGS PARTY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall any CRISIL Ratings Party be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of any part of the report even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

CRISIL Ratings may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of the instruments, facilities, securities or from obligors. Public ratings and analysis by CRISIL Ratings, as are required to be disclosed under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (and other applicable regulations, if any), are made available on its website, www.crisilratings.com (free of charge). Reports with more detail and additional information may be available for subscription at a fee – more details about ratings by CRISIL Ratings are available here: www.crisilratings.com.

CRISIL Ratings and its affiliates do not act as a fiduciary. While CRISIL Ratings has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, CRISIL Ratings does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives and/or relies on in its reports. CRISIL Ratings has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. CRISIL Ratings has in place a ratings code of conduct and policies for managing conflict of interest. For details please refer to:
https://www.crisil.com/en/home/our-businesses/ratings/regulatory-disclosures/highlighted-policies.html.

Rating criteria by CRISIL Ratings are generally available without charge to the public on the CRISIL Ratings public website, www.crisilratings.com. For latest rating information on any instrument of any company rated by CRISIL Ratings, you may contact the CRISIL Ratings desk at crisilratingdesk@crisil.com, or at (0091) 1800 267 1301.

This report should not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person or in any form without prior written consent from CRISIL Ratings.

All rights reserved @ CRISIL Ratings Limited. CRISIL Ratings is a wholly owned subsidiary of CRISIL Limited.

 

 

CRISIL Ratings uses the prefix ‘PP-MLD’ for the ratings of principal-protected market-linked debentures (PPMLD) with effect from November 1, 2011, to comply with the SEBI circular, "Guidelines for Issue and Listing of Structured Products/Market Linked Debentures". The revision in rating symbols for PPMLDs should not be construed as a change in the rating of the subject instrument. For details on CRISIL Ratings' use of 'PP-MLD' please refer to the notes to Rating scale for Debt Instruments and Structured Finance Instruments at the following link: https://www.crisil.com/en/home/our-businesses/ratings/credit-ratings-scale.html