Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Established market position in the gold finance business
The family of the promoter, Mr. V P Nandakumar, has been in the gold-loan business for more than 60 years. Based on this industry experience, the company has designed an appropriate assessment and underwriting methodology. Assessing the purity of gold, fixing the sum that can be lent against a gram of gold, and determining appropriate LTV ratios are critical aspects in the assessment process. The company has a strong brand and reputation in south India (particularly Kerala and Tamil Nadu). Reputation and trust play a significant role in this segment as these give the customer an assurance of getting back personal gold ornaments once the loan is repaid. After shifting towards shorter tenure gold loans of three months in 2015 to de-risk the portfolio from sharp fluctuations in gold prices, the company has witnessed stability in business with an increase in customer base and gold holdings. Despite moderate volume growth and increased competition from banks due to LTV relaxation benefit extended to them until March 31, 2021, the company’s gold loan AUM grew by 12.4% over fiscal 2021 to reach Rs 19,077 crore on March 31, 2021. This was a factor of appreciation in gold prices, new disbursals made at marginally higher than average LTV and, expansion of active customer base. Following the second pandemic wave and the liquidity constraints within certain borrower segments thereafter, nine monthly growth in gold loan portfolio was arrested at 7.2%. Further, the company is now focusing on six month product and lower yield on the high-ticket size loans, to combat competition.
Historically, the company’s operating efficiency – indicated by average gold loan AUM per branch – has been improving over the past few years. As at the end of December 31, 2021, the average AUM per branch stood at Rs 5.75 crore, almost double of that for fiscal 2016.
MAFIL’s extensive branch network and client base, which is relatively more diverse in terms of geographies and is gradually improving further, should support the further strengthening of its competitive position over the medium term. While the company had started to diversify into non-gold segments, its primary focus would remain on gold loans over the medium term in light of the challenges being faced by other asset classes after the pandemic,
The company has maintained strong capital position while ramping up operations over the years. The consolidated networth and gearing were Rs 8160 crore and 3.0 times, respectively, as on December 31, 2021. Large accretion to networth in the past several years has resulted in a healthy capital adequacy ratio of 30% as on December 31, 2021. Lower asset-side risk (security of gold, which is liquid and is in the lender's possession) also supports capitalisation. AUM in the gold loan segment is expected to grow at a steady rate and will remain the major asset class over the medium term even while other segments (microfinance, housing finance and vehicle finance) continue to grow. CRISIL Ratings understands that the group intends to cap its capital allocation to the microfinance segment at 10% over the medium term due to the unsecured nature of the business, and therefore, will look for external investors for the segment in the medium term. Over the past six fiscals, gearing (consolidated and standalone) remained below 4 times whereas standalone tier I capital adequacy ratio remained above 20%. CRISIL Ratings believes that strong internal cash generation from the gold finance business will strengthen MAFIL’s standalone capital position and, allow the company to prudently capitalise its subsidiaries and provide timely need-based financial support.
- Profitability expected to remain strong
Profitability has remained strong with a consolidated RoMA of 7.2% during fiscal 2021 (5.6% during fiscal 2020), driven by the large profit generated by the gold loan segment—net profit increased to Rs 1,698 crore in fiscal 2021 from Rs 1,230 crore in fiscal 2020. The microfinance segment reported a profit of Rs 16 crore during fiscal 2021 against Rs 235 crore in fiscal 2020. The home finance segment reported net profit of Rs 10 crore in fiscal 2021 against Rs 11 crore in fiscal 2020. For the nine months ended December 31, 2021, gold loan segment reported a net profit of Rs 1,039 crore, while that of microfinance reported net profit of Rs 21 crore and home finance segment reported net profit of Rs 6.8 crore.
The consolidated net profit for the company stood at Rs 1,725 crore in fiscal 2021 as against Rs 1,480 crore in fiscal 2020. During nine months ended December 31,2021 the company report net profit of Rs 1,068 crore as against Rs 1,257 crore in corresponding year of previous fiscal. The RoMA for the company during nine months ended December declined to 4.3% on account of increase in operating expenses relating to marketing strategy that included advertisements and employee benefits etc. and lower yields provided to high ticket customers to support growth. The ability of the company to maintain its yields and limit operating cost will be critical for stability in profitability. Besides, given its diversification into other segments, asset quality and profitability of the non-gold businesses will also remain monitorable.
As on December 31, 2021, the company’s consolidated borrowings (including off balance sheet funding through securitisation and external commercial borrowings - ECBs) from banks (public and private) and financial institutions stood at around 63%; higher than the 49% as on March 31, 2021. For the same period, the share of commercial paper (CP) marginally increased to 6% from 5%. Because of its legacy and highly secured asset class, MAFIL is able to roll over existing bank lines/ CP and continue to raise fresh funds from diversified sources. Between April 1,2021 and January 31,2022, the company raised fresh borrowings around Rs 12,760 crore through term loans and WCDL. The standalone cost of borrowing was 7.9% during nine months ended December 2021 as compared to 9.7% in fiscal 2021. The consolidated cost of borrowing during nine months ended December 2021 declined to 8.6% as compared to during 10% in fiscal 2021.
In terms of standalone funding, while a larger proportion of the borrowings comprised funding lines from banks and financial institutions (47%), the company’s resource profile was diversified across avenues such as non-convertible debentures (NCDs) and subordinated debt (31%), commercial paper (CP; 8%), and external commercial borrowings (15%) as on December 31, 2021.
Weaknesses:
- High operating cost in the gold and microfinance businesses
The nature of the gold loan business results in high operating cost. With a large network of ~4,600 branches as on December 31, 2021, the company incurs substantial branch operating cost as proximity to the customer plays a key role in gold loan financing. Additionally, the company incurs high security cost to ensure the safety of the gold ornaments. To reduce cost per branch, the company is taking steps to increase the gold AUM per branch, which has improved consistently over the years. Though still low at Rs 5.7 crore per branch in the third quarter of fiscal 2022, it has increased from Rs 3.8 crore per branch in fiscal 2019. The company has taken several steps to reduce the staff cost at branches. While online gold loan is one of the ways, its share decreased to 41% of the gold AUM in the third quarter of fiscal 2022 from 54% in fiscal 2021. The decline in online gold loan portfolio is on account of rebate option being made available to offline customers, earlier it was exclusive for online gold customers.
On a standalone basis, the operating cost of the company decreased to 4.8% in fiscal 2021 from 7.2% in fiscal 2019. The company has been taking steps to cross-sell other asset segments and use the existing branch network to reduce operating cost. In the microfinance business, the AUM per branch, though low at around Rs 5.6 crore as on March 31, 2021, has increased from Rs 2.6 crore as on March 31, 2017. The operating cost is expected to benefit from operating leverage as the portfolio scales up.
- Geographical concentration in operations and the associated risks
Operations have significant regional concentration compared to large asset-financing non-banking finance companies (NBFCs); South India accounted for 63% of total AUM as on December 31, 2021. Moreover, there is susceptibility to regulatory risks related to revenue concentration in a single asset class (gold-loan financing), which accounts for 76% of revenue. The non gold loan segments like vehicle finance, affordable housing finance and microfinance segments, these accounted for 33% of the total portfolio and around 24% of revenue as on December 31, 2021. In view of the large gold loan book (67% of the total portfolio) and the presence of the gold loan business mainly in South India, revenue is likely to remain concentrated geographically and in terms of asset class over the medium term.
- Potential challenges associated with non-gold loan segments
The non-gold segments accounted for 33% of the overall portfolio as on December 31, 2021 (33% as on March 31, 2020). While the company has managed to grow these businesses and increase the segmental share over the past two years, potential challenges linked to seasoning of the loan book and asset quality remain. Within the housing finance segment, MAHOFIN operates in the affordable housing finance segment, catering to self-employed customers engaged in small business activities and thus, have a relatively weak credit risk profile because of the volatile nature of their income and employment in un-organised segments. Similarly, microfinance loans (under Asirvad Microfinance), through which the company intends to cater to weaker sections of the society, are unsecured in nature and are rendered to borrowers with a weak credit risk profile. This segment also exhibits high subjectivity to local socio-political issues. The vehicle finance business (under MAFIL) deals with lending against commercial vehicles and equipment – majority of which are used/pre-owned vehicles.
With respect to impact of covid-19, the non-gold businesses have faced asset quality challenges in the aftermath of the pandemic. While collections across most of these segments, after dropping drastically in Q1 2021, had started to revive in the second half of the fiscal, the second wave has prolonged the improvement and impacted the asset quality metrics in first half of current fiscal. Consequently, the GNPAs have increased significantly. As on December 31, 2020, the GNPA for the microfinance business (Asirvad) was 2.8%, for housing loans (MAHOFIN) was 6.2% and in vehicle finance segment was 5.2%.%. In light of prevailing asset quality challenges including that of the restructured book done especially in microfinance segment, the standalone earnings profile of non-gold businesses is expected to remain weak over the next few quarters. From a longer term perspective, as the growth within these segments as well, the ramp-up in businesses while managing asset quality and profitability will be a key monitorable.