| Muthoot Microfin Limited | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ‘CRISIL PPMLD A r/Stable’ assigned to Long Term Principal Protected Market Linked Debentures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rating Action | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 crore = 10 million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refer to Annexure for Details of Instruments & Bank Facilities |
Detailed Rationale CRISIL Ratings has assigned its ‘CRISIL PPMLD Ar/Stable’ rating to the Rs 125 crore principal protected market linked debentures of Muthoot Microfin Limited (MML). Ratings has also reaffirmed its ratings on the company’s long-term bank facilities and outstanding debt obligations at ‘CRISIL A/CRISIL PPMLD Ar/Stable/CRISIL A1’. CRISIL Ratings has also withdrawn its ratings on Non-Convertible Debentures of Rs 125 crores (See annexure 'Details of Rating Withdrawn') as CRISIL Ratings has received independent confirmation that these instruments have been redeemed. The withdrawal is in line with CRISIL Ratings withdrawal policy.
The rating factors in the expectation of continued support from the parent, Muthoot Fincorp Ltd. The ratings also factor in MML's adequate capitalisation and diversified resource profile. However, externalities have led to increase in delinquencies, thereby impacting its profitability. The geographical concentration in MML’s portfolio and the susceptibility of the microfinance sector to various regulatory and legislative risks partially offset the above strengths.
The prefix 'PP-MLD' indicates that the principal amount of the debentures is protected, while the returns market-linked. The suffix 'r' shows that the returns on the debentures have significant risks other than credit risk. Also, payments to investors are not fixed and are linked to external variables such as commodity prices, equity indices, foreign exchange rates or equity valuation of the company.
MML’s asset under management stood at Rs 4,950 as of March 2021. In the aftermath of the second wave of the pandemic, consolidated AUM improved by 9.1% in the first nine months of fiscal 2022 to Rs 5399 crore over the previous fiscal. The company’s collection efficiency (including overdues but excluding prepayments), which reached over 100% in March 2021, marked by higher overdue payments, was severely impacted in April and May 2021 with the sharp spike in number of cases in the second wave of the pandemic and various forms of lockdowns imposed by states to curb the spread of Covid-19. However, June saw collections improving to 85%, which has further improved to over 100% from July 2021 to January 2022. Alongside, disbursements have also improved with average monthly disbursement at over Rs 500 crore in December and January 2021.
The company’s, 90+ days past due (dpd) remained high at 8.0% as of December 2021, compared with 5.7% during March 2020. Additionally, the company has outstanding restructured portfolio (under RBI Resolution framework 2.0) of Rs 655 crore as of December 31, 2021. Any change in the payment discipline of borrowers will affect delinquency levels and hence MML’s ability to manage asset quality and maintain healthy collections across buckets including restructured portfolio will remain key monitorable. |
Analytical Approach The ratings on MML have been notched up to factor in the expected support from MFL, the parent and the flagship company of Muthoot Pappachan Group (MPG). |
Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description Strengths:
Parental support is expected on an ongoing basis as well as in the event of distress. Given majority ownership, shared name, common branding and corporate identity, CRISIL Ratings believes MFL has a strong moral obligation to support MML. The MPG promoters are also on the board of MML. The microfinance business is strategically important and is the second largest, in terms of AUM, for the group, after gold loans. The business has stabilised and has contributed significantly to the parent's profitability over the four years through fiscal 2021 (loss in fiscal 2018 was primarily on account of change in accounting method from IGAAP to IndAS. In addition, MML provides diversity to the product profile.
In addition to this, MML has recently in December 2021 raised $50 million; Greater Pacific Capital (GPC) being the investor. GPC also an option to invest additional $20 million by Q1 in next fiscal 2022 subject to regulatory approvals. This infusion has further strengthened MML’s capital position to adequately support its medium term growth plans.
The promoters have spent over seven decades in the business of lending, beginning with gold loans, and have over the years forayed into two-wheeler financing, microfinance and housing finance. MPG started its microfinance operations as a separate division of MFL in 2010 and continued it until September 2015. In December 2011, the group acquired a Mumbai-based non-banking financial company (NBFC), Pancharatna Securities Ltd, and renamed it MML. After receiving the NBFC-MFI license from the RBI in March 2015, the microfinance business was shifted to MML from MFL. The second line of management comprises professionals with extensive experience in lending, audit, operations, risk, credit and information technology. Over the years, the group has established a strong reputation and brand in South India, particularly Kerala and Tamil Nadu, and has an appropriate assessment and underwriting methodology, which is being constantly refined.
Historically, the microfinance business has been one of the most profitable businesses for MPG. However, in fiscal 2020, the company reported profit after tax (PAT) of Rs 18 crore, against Rs 201 crore in fiscal 2019. Improved profitability in fiscal 2019 could also partly be attributed to the transitional provisions of IndAS, as the company adopted it for the first time during the year. The decline in profitability in fiscal 2020 was on account of increase in delinquencies, which impacted interest income, as well as a spike in credit costs on account of the company's adoption of an aggressive provisioning policy during the period. Considering the current unprecedented times and the credit profile of borrowers, the company is continuing with higher provisioning (including write-offs) even in the current fiscal as they did in fiscal 2020 and 2021. As a result, the company has reported a profit of Rs 9.4 crore in the first nine months of fiscal 2022.
Credit costs stood at 2.6% in fiscal 2021 on account of continued asset quality pressures in certain geographies, linked to pandemic besides floods and local socio-political issues and the company's aggressive provisioning policy. MML wrote off Rs 111 crore in fiscal 2021 (~2.2% of book as of March 2021). During the first nine months of current fiscal, the company has made provisions of Rs 95.4 crore (including write-offs of Rs 11.7 crore). Given the aggressive provisioning implemented by the company in last two fiscals as well as the current fiscal, profitability is expected to remain subdued in the current fiscal. Nevertheless, MML’s ability to manage recoveries once normalcy is restored would be a key rating sensitivity factor.
Weaknesses:
After showing improvement in fiscal 2019, wherein 90+ days past due (dpd) improved to 2% as of March 2019 from 3.1% a year earlier, the company’s asset quality metrics deteriorated in fiscal 2020.
The 90+ dpd increased to 5.7% as on February 29, 2020, on account of floods in Kerala and Odisha and political unrest in Karnataka. The company also faced challenges in some districts of Tamil Nadu, such as Madurai and Sivagangai because of a cyclone and socio-political issues in coastal Karnataka and Gujarat. However, the company has consciously curtailed disbursements in the affected branches and regions and has shifted its focus to collections in these areas in an effort to keep a check on further delinquencies.
However, asset quality deteriorated in fiscal 2021 and during the first half of fiscal 2022 amid the pandemic. The 90+ dpd stood at 8.0% as on December 31, 2021, on account of the impact of Covid-19 induced lockdown on the economy and the income-generating capacity of the borrowers. In addition, the outstanding restructured portfolio as on December 31, 2021 was Rs 655 crore. Management of recoveries once normalcy is restored in business operations and the ability to manage asset quality and maintain healthy collections across buckets including restructured portfolio will remain key monitorable.
Operations are expected to remain concentrated in South India over the medium term. MML's microfinance operations from three states accounted for around 66.7% of AUM as on December 31, 2021 with Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka contributing 33%, 25% and 9.4%, respectively. The company has been expanding operations outside southern India to around 13 other states over the past two years. As a result, per-state concentration has been consistently declining, with the top state accounting for 33% of the total portfolio as on December 31, 2021, down from 53% as on March 31, 2016. However, the ability to replicate similar systems, processes and controls in new geographies will need to be closely monitored. As a result of the natural calamities in fiscal 2018 (cyclones in Tamil Nadu and Odisha and floods in Kerala), the company plans to reduce geographical concentration of portfolio to around 20% per state, over the medium term, in order to reduce the impact of such events on the overall portfolio.
The microfinance sector has witnessed two major disruptive events in its life cycle of around 15 years. The first one was the crisis in Andhra Pradesh in 2010 and the second was demonetisation in 2016. In addition, the sector has faced issues in several geographies of varying intensity. Promulgation of the ordinance on MFIs by the Andhra Pradesh government in 2010 demonstrated their vulnerability to regulatory and legislative risks. The ordinance triggered a chain of events that adversely affected the business models of MFIs by impairing their growth, asset quality, profitability and solvency. Similarly, the sector witnessed sizeable delinquencies following demonetisation and subsequent socio-political events. This indicates the fragility of the business model to external risks. Since the business involves lending to the poor and downtrodden sections of the society, MFIs will remain exposed to socially sensitive factors, including charging high interest rates and, consequently, tighter regulations and legislation. |
Liquidity: Adequate The company had cash and equivalent, including liquid investments, of Rs 408 crore as on December 31, 2021, against debt obligation of Rs 317 crore due for servicing over the two months until February 2022 (excluding term loans and securitisation lines). This represents liquidity cover (assuming 75% collection efficiency) of 1.95 times for two months. In addition, the company had securitisation lines of Rs 600 crore as on December 31, 2021. The liquidity is also supported by the steady level of collections that the company has been reporting for the last 2-3 months and fresh sanctions in pipeline. Liquidity is further cushioned by need-based and timely funding support from the parent, MFL. |
Outlook: Stable CRISIL Ratings believes MML will continue to benefit from the strong support of its parent, MFL. |
Rating Sensitivity factors Upward factors:
Downward factors:
|
About the Company MML, a part of MPG, provides microfinance loans to women. MPG started its microfinance operations in 2010 as a separate division of MFL, the flagship company of the group. In December 2011, the group acquired a Mumbai-based NBFC, Pancharatna Securities Ltd, and renamed it MML. In March 2015, MML received an NBFC-MFI licence from the RBI. As on March 31, 2021, MFL held 58.7% equity and MFL's promoters held 22.5% in MML. Along with the promoters, MML's board includes one member nominated by Creation Investments and four independent directors.
MML had AUM of Rs 5,399 crore and networth of Rs 1102 crore as on December 31, 2021. Operations of the microfinance division are spread across Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Puducherry, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Haryana, Rajasthan, Goa, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha, West Bengal, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Bihar. |
Key Financial Indicators
|
Any other information: Not applicable |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument: CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels are assigned to various types of financial instruments. The CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels are available on www.crisil.com/complexity-levels. Users are advised to refer to the CRISIL Ratings' complexity levels for instruments that they consider for investment. Users may also call the Customer Service Helpdesk with queries on specific instruments. |
Annexure - Details of Instrument(s)
@yet to be issued
Annexure - Details of Rating Withdrawn
|
| Annexure - Rating History for last 3 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All amounts are in Rs.Cr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annexure - Details of Bank Lenders & Facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This Annexure has been updated on 23-Mar-22 in line with the lender-wise facility details as on 07-Sep-21 received from the rated entity.
Criteria Details
|